cs aapt logoThe Chicago Section of the AAPT, Spring 2006 Meeting at Chicago State University

Theme: Using Physics Education Research to Guide Instruction
Date: April 1st, 2006

Presentations and Student Poster Session: Business and Health Sciences Building Room 102
Afternoon Workshops: Williams Science Center (rms: TBA)

Click here for the Program.

9501 S. King Drive, Directions to CSU


The spring session will focus on how we can use the results of physics education research as a guide to informing what happens in instruction in the classroom.  The program will use the high school and the college classroom as a context for discussion. 

CPDU's are available for teachers attending the meeting.



Plenary Speaker:

Gary E. Gladding, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
Director of the Illinois Physics Education Research Group at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
winner of the
2005 AAPT Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching Award

Physics Education Research at the University of Illinois

    In 1995, the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois embarked on a program to systematically reform all of the introductory courses in the calculus-based sequence.  By the Spring Semester of 2000, all 2600 students taking introductory courses (both calculus-based and algebra-based sequences) were participating in reformed classes (see: http://www.physics.uiuc.edu/Research/PER/Course_Revisions.html)..  One outcome of this project was the creation of a Physics Education Research Group.  In this talk, I will describe the current activities of our group.



Morning Workshop: 

        Use of the PRS studnet response system in general education physics and astronomy classes
(does not require pre-registration)

Background: Ray Burnstein, Illinois Institute of Technology
Application: Paul Dolan, Mahmoud Khalili, Richard Delzenero, Ilya Gulkarov, Northeastern Illinois U
 
Part I
    A wide overview of wireless keypads will be presented ranging from their usefulness in the classroom to the hardware itself.  The ability of these devices to convert a classroom/lecture of passive audience into a group of more active learners will be discussed. This can be done while still preserving much of the traditional lecture format.  We also will summarize the variety of commercial wireless keypads that are currently in use and those that will soon become available.

Part II
    For the past three years, NEIU has been using an automated student response method, in particular the “PRS” system in general education Astronomy lectures, and this year also began using this system in the ‘conceptual physics’ lecture.  Each student is required to obtain a PRS ‘clicker’, and of course to bring it to class.  The system allows students to respond to multiple choice questions posed by the instructor, and gives immediate and anonymous feedback on student knowledge and learning.  The questions may be either pre-prepared questions, or ones that arise during class. 

    We will briefly discuss our experience with this system, and then present a sample lesson, with PRS questions included.  ‘Clickers’ will be available to allow the audience to interactively answer the questions posed during the lesson.  We will also provide several handouts on the effective use of the student response system, and PRS in particular.



Afternoon Workshops (although preregistration is not mandatory, in order to obtain a count and prepare enough materials we strongly recommend preregistering for the workshops):
Click here to access the form to register for the workshops
- send the document either as an attachment or as part of the email to sbowen@csu.edu)
(Deadline for workshop registration: March 17th)

** if you have any difficulty submitting the form please send all info in an email to msabella@csu.edu. 

Note: workshops that have few participants after the deadline for pre-registration may be canceled.


Problem Solving in Physics
Charles Henderson (Charles.Henderson@wmich.edu), Western Michigan University
    Problem solving is a nearly universal component of physics instruction.  Students are expected to learn physics by watching the teacher solve problems and solving problems on their own.  Learning is typically assessed by having students solve problems on tests.  Problem solving is also seen by many physics teachers to be an important learning goal in itself.  Because of the importance of problem solving, it is valuable for teachers to examine their teaching practices related to problem solving (such as the types of problems assigned, the way student solutions are graded, and the structure of instructor solutions) and the assumptions that underlie these practices.  The goal of this workshop is to help teacher  articulate and examine their practices and assumptions.  Examples of a range of possible practices will be used to anchor the interactive discussion. 


Tasks Inspired by Physics Education Research
Curtis  J  Hieggelke (curth@jjc.edu), Joliet Junior College
and
David P Maloney (maloney@ipfw.edu), Indiana University -Purdue University Fort Wayne
    This workshop will feature materials from a collection of new instructional materials for the topics and concepts in electrostatics and magnetism. These materials employ various TIPER (Tasks Inspired by Physics Education Research) formats that include: Ranking Tasks; Working Backwards Tasks; What, if anything, is Wrong Tasks; Qualitative Reasoning Tasks; Bar Chart Tasks; Conflicting Contentions Tasks; Linked Multiple Choice Tasks; Changing Representations Tasks; and other types of alternative task formats. The tasks are arranged into sets of issues or questions that provide ways of asking the same or connected questions in different ways. TIPERs can be readily deployed in an active learning mode as well as in a traditional lecture mode. They require little student learning to handle the task format, and these tasks can be used as tools for assessment. They are designed to provide small incremental changes as they are implemented, so teachers should find them fairly easy to incorporate them into their classes. Participants will be provided copies of published materials and a CD on TIPERs


Teaching High School Physics using Modeling Instruction
Yohan Tabora (JTabora@northsideprep.org), Nathan Harada (NHarada@northsideprep.org), and Brad Noren (mrnoren@yahoo.com),
Chicago Public Schools

    The Modeling Instruction Method for Physics is a guided-inquiry physics program based out of Arizona State University which revolves around a small, coherent set of scientific models that comprise the core content of physics. Students learn basic conceptual tools (graphical, mathematical, etc.) to accurately describe physical phenomena. (www.modeling.asu.edu)


Program

8:00 to 9:00 Welcome and Registration
(talks will begin at 9:00 AM)
BHS 102
9:00 to 10:00 Contributed Talks I
10:00 to 10:50
Plenary Talk
10:50 to 11:00
Break
11:00 to 12:15 Contributed Talks II
12:15 to 12:30 Take Fives
12:30 to 1:30 Lunch, Business Meeting, and Student Poster Session
1:30: walk over to Williams Science Center
1:45 to 3:00 Afternoon Workshops
Problem Solving in Physics
Tasks Inspired by Physics Education Research
Modeling in HS Physics

WSC-113
WSC-202
WSC-108

BHS: Business and Health Science Building
WSC: Williams Science Center



Fees:
$5 membership dues (includes meeting), $3 registration for meeting only, $1 student registration
$5 lunch (Ann Brandon and Jan Dudzik
)
$3 parking on CSU campus


Contacts:
Mel Sabella (presentation contact person)
Chicago State University
773-995-2172
msabella@csu.edu
Samuel P. Bowen (workshop contact person)
Chicago State University
773-995-3804
sbowen@csu.edu
Paul Dolan (student poster session contact person)
Northeastern Illinois University
773-442-5785
p-dolan@Neiu.edu





last updated 1-06, sabella